What is taught is the exact opposite of the words:


Heaven is this earth as the Olam Habah (world to come)-but they say it's another place perceived in the clouds:
(Ecclesiastes 1:4) (Psalm 37:22) (Psalm 37:34) (Psalms 37:29)(Isaiah 24:21-23) (Isaiah 25:8) & even their own bible(Matt 16:18).

Mishnah: Israel will have a portion in the world to come, for it is written,"Thy people are all righteous; they shall inherit the land forever,(heaven on earth) the branch of my planting, the work of My hands, that I may be glorified.'

The Righteous shall never be removed: but the wicked shall not inhabit the earth. (Proverbs 10:30)
In their own Bible: "For the upright shall dwell in the land, and the perfect shall remain in it. 22 But the wicked shall be cut off from the earth, and the transgressors shall be rooted out of it."
(Then if the Righteous "never" leave this earth then why do they teach a Rapture, unless they admit they are the wicked?)

Dead Sea Scrolls 4Q418 Frag. 81
13for all times His glory and His beauty are for the eternal plantation [of His chosen . . . ] |4[ . . . in..]*All those who inherit the earth shall walk, forth in heaven [...]* (meaning Heaven is this earth)
Thomas Verse 113 His disciples said to him, "When will the kingdom come?" Jesus said, "It will not come be looking for it. Nor will it do"to say, 'Behold over here!' or 'Behold, over there!'. Rather, the kingdom of the Father is spread out on the earth, but people do not see it."
Amazingly many people argued that this verse means nothing, simply because it's the spoken words by Thomas' account. This is a typical cop out & smoke screen, as well as very deceptive tactic of people who need to lie to justify their faith. Well now that I caught them making excuses I can show you an exact replica of this verse in: Luke 17:20-21. So by keeping the same honest standard of reasoning then this means Luke is also invalid, so why do they use his gospels? AHH see they can't have it both ways like they always want it, nor use it as an excuse to avoid truths.
Death is final rest back to the dust of the earth (but they say sky):
Ecc 3:20
ďAll go to the same place; all originate from dust and all return to dust.Ē

Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the Lord God; 'Behold, I am against your pillows (symbolically meaning:feathers/wings or dream/ fantasy) , wherewith ye there hunt the souls to make them FLY, and I will tear them from your arms. and will let the souls go, even the souls that ye hunt to make them fly... (this means the souls that are stolen in the false hope of afterlife where they are told the soul rises and flys to a false, fantasy heaven.)
(22) Because with lies you have made the heart of the righteous sad, whom I have not made sad; and strengthened the hands of the wicked, that he should not return from his wicked way, by PROMISING HIM LIFE:Therefore ye shall see no more vanity, nor divine divinations: for I will deliver My People out of your hand: and ye shall know that I am the Lord."
No one has gone to heaven, John 3:13 says:
verse 13 Hebrews speaks "These ALL died in faith, not having received the promises..." If they didn't receive the promises yet, then none of them is in heaven, which agrees with John 3:13: "And no man has ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven."
Psalms 6:3-5
ďoh save me for thy mercies' sake. For in death there is no remembrance of thee: in the grave who shall give thee thanks?
Psalms 115:17
The dead praise not the LORD, neither any that go down into silence. (These verses prove, once your dead, you're not with God or praising God in Heaven) Ecclesiastes 9:5,6 For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten. Also their love, and their hatred, and their envy, is now perished; neither have they any more a portion for ever in any thing that is done under the sun.
If the Bible is saying the dead can't affect anything that happens here on earth. Why are people still praying to these dead saints when the dead can't hear them? Why do people still believe in hauntings, seances, apparitions etc??? They believe it because they never read in their Bibles the truth about these things, & they trust people who need to sell snake oil in order to have an audience.
So in Summary to Death and Afterlife: Our Spirit (energy) canít escape our law of properties and have conciousness or senses without a processor, which is from our brain throughout our vessel (Body). That's why we were formed, in stages of Processions, layer after layer, in order for concious energy to form out of being placed in a vessel which processed energy to give us the ability to experience "life". This is why there is no afterlife as energy, by itself, has no senses or conscious. This is the "ONE" life grace and we are blowing it for the fantasy deception.

THE CREATOR IS NOT A MAN (but they picture him as one): G0D himself says that "G0D is not a man-Numbers 23:19, /G0D has no physical image or form" (in Isaiah 2:22, 14:11-13, I Samuel 15:29, Hosea 11:9, Deuteronomy 4:11-12 and the 13 major principles of the Jewish faith based on the Rambam's teaching of "ain lo demus haguf ve'ayno guf" - that G-d has no physical form.) Gen. 1:27 uses "tzelem," which refers to an Image meaning the nature or essence of a thing not Image meaning form="to'ar".
ďYou're not to paint a picture of spiritual beings.Ē
Deuteronomy 4:16
"Lest ye corrupt [yourselves], and make you a graven image, the
similitude of any figure, the likeness of male or female"
Deuteronomy 4:17
"The likeness of any beast that [is] on earth, the likeness of any winged fowl that flieth in the air,"
(Because the Myth placed on ANGELS causes distortions and confusion on understanding what they are and accepting the Archangels who wonít look like the portraits)
Deuteronomy 4:23
"Take heed unto yourselves, lest ye forget the covenant of the LORD your God,
which he made with you, and make you a graven image, [or] the likeness of [anything Spiritual]..."
(Because expectations and Perceptions will be of that image)
Exodus 20:3-7 and Deuteronomy 5:8-10 We are forbidden to pray to any image of anything Physical

Angels are another term for messengers in the Hebrew (Malakh) and Greek (Aggelos). Sometimes refered to in Heaven (future world to come) but always seen as mere men of human form: (OT: Gen. 18:2; 19:1,10, NT:Luke 24:4; Acts 1:10) Never in the early scripture do they have wings, or are they portrayed as mythical supernatural beings. Someone mistakenly argued that the Bible did talk about wings, however, not on Malakh (angels) and it was a silly dream. That's like saying the Beast will have clay feet, because Daniel saw clay feet. The dream interpretation is more deep, as figuratively and not literal. Thus wings could hint to traveling messages through space and time. The Placement of Wings and assumptions of spirtual characters was borrowed & placed later by fantasy and distortions against the scripture warnings. So the term angel denotes any agent G-d sends forth to execute his will. It is a word used for an ordinary messenger (Job 1:14: 1 Sam. 11:3; Luke 7:24; 9:52). Also a word used for prophets who are messengers of G-d (Isa. 42:19; Hag. 1:13), a term used for Rabbis (Mal. 2:7), and even Christians used the term for their ministers of the New Testament (Rev. 1:20) as well as the term 'prince' for their cardinals. More proof on this understanding of the term angel: Ante-Nicene Fathers, V.10 (10), Page 466 Origen [d.AD 254], Commentaries of Origen, Gospel of John, Book 1, 13 -The Angels Also Are Evangelists. Also from St. Ambrose (340-397) On the Mysteries calling Priests angels: Chapter 2 "For the priest's lips keep knowledge, and they seek the law at his mouth, for he is the angel of the Lord Almighty." Since I clearly show where heaven is (the Future Earth), then Angels are simply messengers from Future Earth and can't be assumed otherwise by myths and poor teachings that are against the words. Michael being the remover and rebuker of the first chief prince and considered the rightful Viceroy, Chief Prince, and Head Malakh called prince of the congregation. Means being chief of the hosts (temple priests), liken to the recognition of the Pope as chief messenger and head of his Hosts of Bishops and head of his Cardinals he calls princes. In other words the imposter and first failed and fallen viceroy is the seat of the papacy which is in the mock temple coming out of the sea(Rome)and not Jerusalem.
Moshiach is and must be human {Hilchos Melachim 11:3-4}
"And a right Prophet (Prophet of Righteousness ) will the Lord your God give you, a Prophet from among you, of your brethren.Ē
"...out of thee(MAN) shall come forth unto me a Judge to be Ruler in Israel,and this is the King Messiah."
"The Scripture calleth the name of the Messiah, because He is the Mediator through whom we shall get the righteousness of the Lord." (Proof Messiah is just a liaison between the Lord and his people and is not the Lord himself, so heís not God, just a reflection of his principals or "One who's AS God".)

Misconception of Perfection or Sinless Messiah
Thanksgiving Hymn 12
Righteous, I know, is not man, nor is perfection the way of son of man: to the Most High G0D belongs all righteous deeds. The way of man is not established, except by the spirit which G0D created for him, to make perfect a way for the children of men, that all his creatures may know the might of his power, and the abundance of his mercies towards all the sons of his grace.
A person is still righteous even if he/she occassionally sins: see I Kings 15:5, Num 32:11-12.
Understand, the Messiah was viewed as someone to be, just a man (Hilchos Melachim 11:3-4), as Moses was, just a man (Deut 18:18). What made Moses great and will make the Messiah great, is the will and character to lead and liberate. Just men with devotion towards what is fair, and they are just men, with extra senses and portions of ďLightĒ (i.e. Knowledge and Truth). The Messiah is not supernatural, or G0D, like the myths placed on previous idols to give them more power. The Mistakes and transgression formed, because the Romanís didnít understand the Messianic concept from the Judaic scripture, and they placed their pagan mythical concepts into the role of the Messiah. Therefore this distorted expectation and teaching is a great mistake in understanding the working and mysteries of man, the bible prophecy, and the intended path to fulfillment of G0Dís promises. People are therefore living in a Santa Claus Syndrome. Kids grow out of it, so why canít the adults?

Just way too opposite, to not notice something's wrong:
The Messiah is to bring peace to the nations but they say the Anti Christ will bring a false peace, so if the Messiah Brings peace heíll be taunted as the anti and if he doesnít they will say heís not the Messiah. (Why donít you just tie his hands behind his back with that logic?)
The Messiah is to bring everyone to one understanding, but they say the anti Christ will try and convert people to one order.
They wonít accept a Messiah unless he does miracles and great things, yet they claim the Anti Christ will do miracles and great things. Are they admiting they are the opposite twist adversary & their Christ is not anoited from God, but perhaps the opposite, Satan? Are they admiting they want to chase the Messiah away or keep people from recognizing him? Everything they claim has either taken place already (Dan 9 & Rev 11:1-3) or is non biblical and delusional. *This is where those bells and whistles should be going off in your head* Because they keep saying there are two Messiahs, the first deceives before the real one, however, scripture (I John 2:18, Rev 1:1,3,9,19, Rev 3:11,Rev 22:6,7,10,12,Matthew 24:31-34?) points to these things and the Beast coming from their era, which means their Idol Christ was the first false one. Verses backing this:(Ezekiel 21:25-27)& the Coptic Translation of (Genesis 49:10), where the "Shiloh" (one who's right it is) is prempted by the Thief. The One who brings false peace therefore, is their Idol Christ, who is falsely placed as Prince of Peace, even though there never has been any and they had threatened & slain people, forcing us to worship this Image, exactly as they say the anti-christ will do. BINGO!... Seeing through the smokescreen yet?

(3) possible explanations for dead being resurrected in Myths:
1)A man was regarded as dead when excommunicated, therefore being raised from the dead was being released from excommunication.
2)People not knowing about certain symptoms or rare disorders, like one that allows the body to slow down functions, having an undetectable pulse and seemingly no breathing. Many, even today, are buried alive from this rare phenomenon. Also, a coma could be taken in the same manner and when they wake, thus thought of as a miracle. Remember they didnít have the knowledge to understand these things, so everything was supernatural to them. We therefore let their superstition and lack of knowledge permeate and cloud our understanding of stories of that age.
3)Mere supernatural myths, made up from previous religious cultures, such as Zoroastrians , Mithraism. Krishna, & Horus. Stolen and placed later in date to other mythical idols. For instance Mithra was a Roman God predating the Jesus existence. His virgin birth, resurrection, Dec. 25th birthday, 12 disciples, and more similar stories all were used by the Jesusí myths. This Mithra mystery Religious cult was big in Cilicia, which itís capitol was Tarsus where Paul was from. Tarsus, the capital of Cilicia, was built by Sennacherib, the Assyrian king,and was in express imitation of Babylon. Mystery Babylon permeated the rituals and idols of the church. Paul was responsible for the placement of these myths from his culture and faith, upon Jesus. Therefore Jesus never really had these occurrences. They are superstitious, fake and childish thoughts that need to be revealed in order for the world to come back down to reality. The Santa Claus Story Has Got to stop if we want to realize the way things are. The kids grow out of it, so why canít the adults?
Proof of the Above from surviving recordings of history of that era: Lucius Agrius (ca.107bce-41bce) Roman soldier and Mithrasic High Priest (ca.67bce- 41bce) "Among these soldiers was a strong and mighty warrior, whose personality drew many of the Cilicians to him. By inquiry, It was discovered that he was a holy man, and was therefore sought after as a man of wisdom. He led the Cilicians in Prayer at dawn, and again at mid-day and at dusk, never failing to praise his God, Whom he called Mithras." from "The Conversion of Lucius Agrius", paragraph 2, written ca.67bce. Lucius Agrius was a soldier in Pompeiiís army and became the first Roman to serve Mithras, converted by Cilician immigrants to Italy after their defeat by Pompeiiís army. Lucius Agrius served as the first Roman High Priest, and his book is included in the Mithrasic Canon of Scripture. *NEW*
Recently, a minister on TV was discussing how Paul said he read in the books about his lord raising after three days. The Minister even admitted that, at that period, there was no Gospels yet written, so the only book he could have read about a 3 day resurrection was in Mithraic text, which means Paul created the resurrection myth through the Mithra story.


Back to The Visions of the Future Page
New Free Online Book by the Same Author brings everything to proper perspective.
Cool Links & Free Desktop Wallpapers

Email: ourheavenorg@removespamyahoo.comImportant: don't forget to remove the words Ďremovespamí in the e-mail address before sending